Banner
Workflow

After ‘manifesto moment’, budgetary disappointment

After ‘manifesto moment’, budgetary disappointment
Contact Counsellor

After ‘manifesto moment’, budgetary disappointment

  • The 2024 Union Budget has profoundly disappointed the LGBTQ+ community in India, reflecting a broader pattern of governmental neglect toward marginalized groups.
  • Despite pre-election pledges and growing political support for LGBTQ+ rights, the budgetary allocations for queer welfare reveal a stark discrepancy between promises and practice.

Budgetary Shortfalls and Unfulfilled Promises

  • The 2024 Budget’s allocation for the “Comprehensive Rehabilitation for Welfare of Transgender Persons” under the Support for Marginalized Individuals for Livelihood and Enterprise (SMILE) programme appears promising at first glance, with an increase from ₹52.91 crore to ₹68.46 crore.
  • However, this increase is misleading, as actual expenditure in the previous year was a mere ₹22.82 crore. The operational failure of many Garima Grahas (shelter homes) and the underperformance of the National Council for Transgender Persons (NCTP) highlight the insufficient funding.

The Crisis in HIV/AIDS and STI Funding

  • More troubling is the significant reduction in funding for the National AIDS Control Organisation (NACO), from ₹3,079.97 crore to ₹2,892.00 crore. NACO’s role in combating HIV/AIDS and preventing sexually transmitted infections (STIs) is critical, especially given that LGBTQ+ individuals are at higher risk.
  • The reduction in funds comes at a time when India faces one of the largest HIV epidemics globally, with over 2.4 million people living with HIV, and many unaware of their status.

Systematic Denial of Rights

  • The lack of adequate budgetary support for LGBTQ+ issues represents more than just financial mismanagement; it is a systematic denial of rights. With the 2011 Census estimating 4.9 lakh transgender individuals and more recent estimates suggesting a figure as high as 1.22 crore, the budget allocation of ₹1,400 per transgender person is grossly inadequate.
  • This translates to an average of ₹56 per person, revealing a troubling disregard for the needs of this community. The budget fails to address essential areas such as safe spaces in schools, inclusive mental health care, and equal access to education and employment.

The Role of Political Support and Civil Society

  • Political support from Opposition parties and government members who have previously endorsed LGBTQ+ rights is crucial. Historical successes, such as the election of Shabnam Mausi as India’s first transgender MLA and the establishment of the transgender welfare board in Maharashtra, underscore the importance of sustained civil society pressure.

A Call for Comprehensive Action

  • The recent budget underscores a critical gap between political promises and actual support. For meaningful progress, there must be a concerted effort not only from the central government but also from state and local bodies.
  • The LGBTQ+ community, having navigated years of marginalization and legal battles, now faces a critical juncture. It is imperative that the government’s commitments translate into substantial and effective support.
  • The path forward requires a unified effort from political leaders, civil society, and community advocates to ensure that rights recognized on paper are genuinely realized in practice.

Categories